
The Revolution
Chapter 2
I. The Origins of the American Revolution
What ideas drove the American Revolution?
%2C_by_John_Trumbull.jpg)
John Trumbull's Declaration of Independence, 1817-1819. Wikimedia

Cicero Denounces Catiline, painting by Cesare Maccari, 1888, depicting the Roman consul Cicero charging the aristocrat Catiline with plotting to overthrow the government.

American patriots sought independence from Britain for several reasons. These included issues of taxation, trade policies, conflicts over western expansions, or British interference in colonial affairs, among others. While these issues carried significant weight, their enduring impact did not match the ideological justifications for independence. Ideas related to liberalism, republicanism, and the Great Awakening were pivotal for the revolutionaries, shaping their perspectives on freedom, democracy, and liberty. These factors not only influenced their beliefs but also laid the groundwork for the evolution of fundamental civil rights throughout U. S. history.
Liberalism had a profound impact on the American Revolution. Rooted in Enlightenment philosophy, the central emphasis of liberalism was individual rights and liberties viewed most expressly in freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. Liberalism grew as a response to the abuses of authoritarian monarchs characteristics of the medieval and early modern periods. As such, liberalism emerged to limit the power of governments for the sake of protecting individual rights. As the foremost figure of liberalism, John Locke (1632-1704) laid the foundational principles that later became central to liberal thought. According to Locke, all human beings are born with a mind that was a "tabula rasa" (blank slate) and environments were critical in forming the individual. Aristocracies, then, were superior not because of their innate condition but because they were individuals who had access to the finest resources due to their wealth and success. Such views helped fuel antimonarchist sentiment in the colonies. [1]
Republicanism was a political philosophy that prioritized the importance of civic virtue, public participation, and the common good. It challenged monarchy and authoritarianism, promoting the ideal of government by and for the people. Central to republicanism is the belief in representation and consent, asserting that legitimate authority stems from the consent of the governed. In this view, republican ideals emphasized the public interest, that is, the will of the people. While republicanism underscores the importance of the public good and the will of the people, its application in the early years of the nation was limited, as political office was initially accessible only to white, male, landowners.
The Great Awakening reshaped the social and cultural fabric of colonists, altering colonial perspectives on authority, individualism, and the significance of religion. The movement challenged established religious and traditional hierarchies. Although Puritan New England appeared more egalitarian than their European counterparts, religious leaders like John Winthrop and Cotton Mather set patterns for religious leaders to wield great influence on private affairs of individual spirituality. Successive generation of New England Puritans imbibed this deference to authority. In contrast, the Great Awakening emphasized a personal and emotional connection with God as a legitimate form of religious expression that questioned the authority of established churches and clergy.
Additionally, the Great Awakening fostered a sense of personal responsibility in matters of faith that often translated for many Christians into civic responsibility. The concept of individual accountability and the belief in a higher moral calling inspired colonists to strive for the betterment of their society through their actions.
Ultimately, liberalism, republicanism, and the Great Awakening all played significant roles in shaping the desire for independence among American colonists. As Britain sought to tighten its control over the colonies in the years leading up to the Revolutionary War, colonists recognized that British rule did not prioritize their best interests. Fueled by Enlightenment ideals and the spiritual fervor of the Great Awakening, Americans sought to attain freedom at its core.
II. Race & The War for Independence
Did African and Native Americans Contribute to the American Revolution?

Anne S.K. Brown Military Collection, Brown University Library

Scipio Moorhead (?) Portrait of Phillis Wheatley, 1773
At the onset of the American revolution, there were roughly 500,000 African Americans living in the colonies and roughly 90% of them were enslaved. Black Americans keenly observed the irony of a nation pursuing independence while simultaneously clinging to the institution of slavery and called attention to the contradiction.
In the 1770s, Phyllis Wheatley (1753-1784) was a young black writer who made this point clear. Born in Africa, and purchased in 1761, the Wheatleys recognized Phyllis’s intelligence and taught her how to read and write, even allowing her to flourish as a young poet. In her poem on tyranny and slavery, published in 1772, Wheatley describes her misery of being snatched away from her family, the cruelties that characterized her adolescence, and the sorrows that plagued her parents. But when it to her hopes for American revolutionaries, she wondered, “And can I then but pray, Others may never feel tyrannic sway?” Like most American Revolutionaries, Wheatley interpreted British tyranny as a form of slavery. [2]
Thousands of black Americans fought in the Revolutionary War. Although reasons varied, most fought for the cause of advancing liberty in whatever form. Crispus Attucks (1723-1770) was a prominent figure, considered the first person killed in the Boston Massacre on March 5, 1770. Attucks, an African American, became a symbol of the struggle for freedom and equality. After the outbreak of war, George Washington initially believed it would be imprudent to arm enslaved Africans, who might fight alongside their armed masters. This policy changed, however, after Lord Dumore’s proclamation on November 7, 1775 that recruited many black fighters and to promising freedom to slaves who would abandon their slave masters and join British efforts. Eventually, the Continental Congress lifted the ban on black Americans in the army in hopes of securing victory. Black Americans joined the patriots, hopeful that a liberated nation would fully uphold the principles of liberty.
​
When Americans maintained a commitment to slavery well after the war, Benjamin Banneker (1731-1806), a free black mathematician, was sure to highlight the hypocrisy. In a letter rebuking Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), Banneker wrote, “sir, how pitiable is it to reflect that, although you were so fully convinced of the benevolence of the Father of Mankind, and others equal an impartial distribution of these rights and privileges which he had conferred upon them, did you should at the same time counteract His mercies, in detaining by fraud and violence, so numerous apart of my brethren under groaning captivity and cruel oppression, that you should at the same time be found guilty of that most criminal act, which you so professedly detested in others" [3]. Whether through artistic expression or through direct confrontation, black Americans identified the ironies of slavery in a land premised on freedom and equality.
​
Native Americans were also involved in the war efforts. Like black Americans, Native loyalty depended on pre-existing relationships. For example, the Oneida people sided with the colonial cause due to their previous relationship with the Colony of Connecticut. In the “Oneida Declaration of Neutrality, 1775,” delivered through Captain Solomon Ahhaunnauwaumut, the tribe addressed the colonists as “brothers,” and declared, “whenever I see your blood running, you will soon find me about to revenge my brother’s blood…Only point out to me where your enemies keep, and that is all I shall want to know.” For the tribal captain and his fellow Oneidans, the colonists needed to point locate the enemies as the tribe would take care of the rest that is to “fight in my own Indian way.” [4]
Whereas the Oneidans allied with the colonists, the Lenape tribe sided with the British over their disdain for colonists. Writing to his fellow “Christian native Americans at Gnadenhutten in 1781,” Lenape Chief Buckongahelas sought to persuade their alliance towards the British in light of “cruel acts” committed by the colonists. Describing the British-Patriot relationship to that of father-son, the colonists had violated his fellow Indians “in encroaching on their lands, stealing their property, shoot at, and murdering without cause, men, women, and children—Yes! Even murdering those, who at all times had been friendly to them…” [5]
​
The patriots gained victory over the British with the assistance of both black and native Americans. Although each group had disagreements over their alliances, both black and native Americans fought with the patriots in the Revolutionary War. Ironically, however, the new nation's founding documents had precluded their full involvement in society as the United States of America took shape.
III. Race & The Constitution
Does Race appear in the Constitution?

Military.com, National Archives

The signing of the U.S. Constitution by 39 members of the Constitutional Convention on September 17, 1787; painting by Howard Chandler Christy.
The Declaration of Independence
The term “race” is not explicitly mentioned in the U.S. Declaration of Independence. However, the document does contain a passage that reflected common relations between the colonists and the natives during the time. In the list of grievances against King George III we read,
“He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.” [6]
The reference to “merciless Indian Savages” reflected the discriminatory prevailing attitudes among European Americans toward Native Americans during this time. Considering that the document emphasized the rights of all men to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” there is a glaring inconsistency over how equality and civil rights were measured. [7]
At the writing of the Declaration of Independence (1776), slavery was a widespread institution in the colonies. As a document dedicated to fundamental inalienable rights, the Declaration overlooked a major institution that would contradict the nation’s highest ideals in ways that would only plague the nation’s history in the years to come.
The U.S. Constitution
The term "race" is not explicitly stated in the United States Constitution either. Nonetheless, the document includes several provisions concerning race that are frequently misunderstood.
For example, the famous Three-Fifths Compromise (Article I, Section, 2, clause 3) stipulated that slaves be counted as three-fifths of a person. While used often to highlight the racist intention of the framers, the section pertains to issues of apportioning representation and taxes among the states. By referring to slaves as “other persons,” it is difficult to argue that this was a racial view of the fledgling nation. Additionally, the clause only impacted enslaved Africans and not free Africans, which according to some estimates amounted to about 60,000. These free black Americans were counted as full persons, on par with whites. [8]
However, the Constitution does provide some legal protections for the institution of slavery. For example, the Fugitive Slave clause (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3) required that escaped slaves be returned to their owners, reinforcing the rights of slave masters. Additionally, the Importation of Slaves clause (Article I, Section 9, Clause 1) prohibited Congress from banning the importation of slaves before the slave trade was outlawed (in 1808). [9]
Although the term race did not appear in the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution it does not mean that it had no implications on the cultural sentiments on the ideas that were later viewed as racial. In other words, during the Revolutionary era, the idea of race is still emerging and would later conflate with notions of blackness and slavery.
Notes
-
Benjamin Banneker to Thomas Jefferson, 19 August 1791, National Archives
-
Lenape Chief Buckongahelas, selections from “Address to Christian Native Americans at Gnadenhutten,” 1781 in deGraffenried, Julie K., and Stephen M. Sloan, eds. The United States in Global Perspective : A Primary Source Reader. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press, 2020, pg. 55
-
Ibid.
-
U.S. Constitution, Art. IV, Section 2, clause 3; Art. I, Section 9, clause 1