
Civil War Era
Chapter 5
I. Westward Expansion & Slavery
How did Westward Expansion increase debates over slavery?


Tanner, Henry Schenck. A map of the United States of Mexico: as organized and defined by the several acts of the Congress of that Republic, constructed from a great variety of printed and manuscript documents. Philadelphia: H.S. Tanner, 1826. Map. Library of Congress

The westward expansion of the United States not only exacerbated tensions over slavery but also played a significant role in precipitating the Civil War. The process of admitting new states into the Union often involved significant concerns about maintaining a balance between free and slave states. Initially, the Ohio River Valley served as a natural boundary between the North and the South. However, westward expansion gradually eroded this clear division between the free North and the slaveholding South.
Prior to 1818, the balance of power in Congress was shared between free states and slave states. When Missouri applied for statehood, however, it raised concerns about maintaining the balance of power in Congress, as there was no free state prepared for admission to counterbalance the addition of another slave state. Tensions rose as a result and a temporary solution was reached with the Compromise of 1820, which admitted Missouri as a slave state while Maine entered as a free state, thereby preserving the balance. Additionally, the compromise established the 36°30' parallel as a boundary for slavery where the institution was permitted. The act was eventually overturned by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which allowed settlers in those territories to decide the slavery issue through popular sovereignty.
The addition of Texas further complicated matters. Anglo-American settlers began moving into Texas shortly after Mexican independence allowed Texas to become a part of the newly formed Mexican Republic. Mexican officials viewed anglo-American settlement as inevitable and proactively welcomed these ranchers and farmers on terms favorable to Mexico.
Overtime, however, tensions grew between the Anglo settlers and the Mexican government over issues of immigration, local autonomy, and slavery. The Texas Revolution beginning 1835 sought to address these issues and culminated in the following year when the Republic of Texas was formed.
​
Texas struggle to establish itself as an independent nation from Mexico and sought U.S. annexation. The delay of Texas's admission to the Union until 1845 stemmed from apprehensions about disrupting the equilibrium between free and slave states in the union. Thus, Texas remained independent for a decade before its annexation, a move expedited by president James Polk's (1795-1849) recognition of potential free states in the Northwest, namely the Oregon territory.
The ensuing Mexican-American War (1846-1848) only made matters worse. Perceived as a fulfillment of Manifest Destiny, the war intended to obtain full control of the continent ended with the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848. The treaty promised citizenship to Mexicans as the U.S. received the lands that included present-day California, Nevada, Utah, most of Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming. However, the threat over extending slavery into the newly acquired territories continued to exacerbate tensions between the North and South.
One example of lasting tensions emerged with the admission of California into the Union. California's bid for statehood as a free state prompted further debates that culminated in the Compromise of 1850. The legislative move introduced popular sovereignty to determine slavery in new territories and strengthened the Fugitive Slave Act, compelling northern citizens to participate in slave trade enforcement or face penalties. The legislation inspired Harriet Beecher Stowe to pen her most famous novel, Uncle Tom's Cabin, which was heavily influenced by the events unfolding in Congress during this period. Along with other abolitionist literature of the period, the work humanized the plight of the enslaved and stirred widespread empathy and outrage among Northern readers, serving for many as a catalyst for the Civil War. [1]
Further legislative acts that dehumanized black Americans fueled tensions between the North and the South. In 1820, Dr. John Emerson, an army surgeon, had moved to Illinois from the south taking with him Dred Scott, an enslaved worker. After Emerson’s death in 1843, Dred Scott attempted to purchase his freedom from Emerson’s widow, Irene Sanford. When she refused, Scott and his family sued for their freedom in a Missouri state court, arguing that their residence in free territories had made them free. When the case finally reached the Supreme Court in 1857, the landmark decision of Dred Scott v. Sanford ruled against Scott. Declaring that black Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not citizens and therefore had no standing in federal court, the Court ruled that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories. In his ruling, Roger Taney indicated that white slave owners, by virtue of their citizenship to both the state and the nation, were not to be restricted to a geographic region due to the nature of their property. In effect, the ruling overturned years of compromise extending slavery, in effect, to the entire nation.
In summary, westward expansion deeply intertwined issues of slavery, statehood, and racial dynamics, ultimately contributing to the growing tensions that led to the Civil War. Together with the Dred Scott decision, racial tensions over slavery rose to a boiling point as a new election cycle was underway.
II. The Civil War & The Confederacy
Why did the Confederacy Secede from the Union?

President Abraham Lincoln, with officers in 1862, rarely dictated battlefield tactics. Alexander Gardner/Library of Congress

The 1860 presidential election carried great historical significance in the United States, especially in relation to the issue of slavery. Southern slaveholders feared that Abraham Lincoln's (1809-1865) election would lead to the abolition of slavery, either directly from Lincoln or through pressure from his radical abolitionist supporters. Due to this, Lincoln's name was absent from the ballot in numerous Southern states where slavery was prevalent. Nevertheless, Lincoln emerged victorious in the election, garnering sufficient electoral votes to clinch the presidency. This outcome prompted Southern states to seriously contemplate secession.
In December 1860, South Carolina convened a meeting of officials from other Southern slaveholding states to discuss the possibility of secession. Broadly speaking, succession was driven by the Southern states' concerns over states' rights, particular regarding the institution of slavery. South Carolina, thus, became the first state to secede in December 1860. Following South Carolina's lead, several states declared their secession in the following year: Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.
A closer look at the secession ordinances passed by these states reveals that slavery was a central issue. For example, Mississippi’s ordinance of secession established that their “position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery...” Underscoring the ideas stemming from race science, the document read, “Its labor supplied the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun.” [2]
Similarly, Texas hinted at a similar rationale for its secession. The state’s ordinance announced that the confederacy was “established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.” [3]
Furthermore, the Confederate States' constitution explicitly protected the institution of slavery, contrasting sharply with the U.S. Constitution, which only indirectly addressed slavery by leaving it to the states. The Confederate Constitution not only protected slavery but also preemptively forbade any future efforts to abolish it, considering the historical trajectory of the United States. Alexander Stephens (1812-1883), the Confederate Vice President, emphasized the centrality of slavery in his famous "Cornerstone Speech" in which he declared that “the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth." [4]
The events surrounding the secession of the Southern states in the lead-up to the Civil War underscored the central role of slavery undergirded by race science that had established black inferiority. The individual state ordinances, the Confederate constitution, as well as high-ranking politicians established the centrality of this debate in the Civil War.
The Civil War, fought from 1861 to 1865, was a climax of racial tensions that had characterized the U.S. prior to its founding. Slavery was the fundamental root case of the clash as the Southern states relied heavily on enslaved labor for their agrarian economy.
As the war progressed, African Americans played an increasingly important role in the Union war effort. After the Battle of Antietam in 1862, the battles shifted in favor of Union victory, prompting many enslaved individuals to seek refuge in the North. As Union army generals began enlisting black runaway slaves into their ranks, referring to them as "contrabands," Lincoln's legal background spurred him to draft a measure that would absolve the North from violating the Fugitive Slave Act: The Emancipation Proclamation of 1863. The order declared all slaves in the Confederate-hold territories to be free within the states under rebellion, in effect freeing all the runaways that the Union had enlisted. While the proclamation did not end slavery within the border states, it fundamentally altered the nature of the conflict and undergirded the moral purpose for the Union cause.
Facsimile of the 1861 Ordinance of Secession signed by 293 delegates to the Georgia Secession Convention at the statehouse in Milledgeville, Georgia, January 21, 1861.

Lincoln, Abraham. Preliminary Emancipation Proclamation. 1862. Library of Congress.
III. The Legacy of the Civil War
How did the Civil War Impact the Nation

U.S. Colored Troops at Port Hudson, Louisiana circa 1864. National Archives and Records Administration
The Civil War officially ended on April 9, 1865, when Confederate General Robert E. Lee surrendered to Union General Ulysses S. Grant at the Appomattox Court House in Virginia. The following years were marked by the process of Reconstruction, during which the Union sought to rebuild the South and address issues of citizenship, civil rights, and reconciliation.
The legacy of the Civil War, however, was long lasting. The conflict officially ended slavery and freed roughly 4.5 million enslaved laborers. The ratification of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1865 formally abolished slavery throughout the country and stated that, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."[5]
Ultimately, the Civil War led to the abolition of slavery and the reunification of the nation. However, the war had laid the foundation for Reconstruction, during which efforts were made to address issues of citizenship, civil rights, and racial equality. If freedom shaped the aspirations of black Americans prior to the Civil War, equality will become their focus afterward.
Notes
-
Harriet Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom’s Cabin; or, Life Among the Lowly (Boston, 1852), 120-123.
-
“A Declaration of the Immediate Causes which induce and justify the secession of the State of Mississippi from the Federal Union,” Proceedings of the Mississippi State Convention, Held January 7th to 26th, A. D. 1861 (Jackson, Miss: Power & Cadwallader, Book and Job Printers), pg. 47
-
Winkler, Ernest William, ed. Journal of the Secession Convention of Texas 1861, Edited From the Original in the Department of State.... Austin: Texas Library and Historical Commission, 1912, pp. 61-65.
-
Stephens, Alexander Hamilton, "Alexander H. Stephens, in public and private: with letters and speeches, before, during, and since the war by Henry Cleveland," p. 717-729, 21 March 1861.
-
The House Joint Resolution Proposing the 13th Amendment to the Constitution, January 31, 1865; Enrolled Acts and Resolutions of Congress, 1789-1999; General Records of the United States Government; Record Group 11; National Archives.